Personally, I prefer the interface of Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder. Obviously, the technology of TunesKit Audio Capture is more advanced.Ĭonclusion: 1 point for TunesKit Audio Capture. Besides, because the data extracted is lossless, the audio quality as a result can also be lossless. Therefore, no matter how many songs you are playing at the same time, TunesKit Audio Capture will only record audio from the selected software.
Though sounds inevitably mix up with each other, the data won't. Unlike its competitor, TunesKit Audio Capture extracts the data of each sound before it starts recording the audio. There is nothing wrong with real-time recording, but it still lacks innovation. The technology used by the team behind Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder is the traditional real-time recording. So what causes the disparities of recording between the two recording software? It is their operating mechanism.
#APOWERSOFT IPHONE RECORDER LICENSE SOFTWARE#
That being said, TunesKit Audio Capture still has the ability to grab multiple audios from different software simultaneously and dividing them into independent tracks automatically.Ĭonclusion: TunesKit Audio Capture costs a little more efforts but provides a better experience, so 1 more point for TunesKit Streaming Audio Capture.
#APOWERSOFT IPHONE RECORDER LICENSE FREE#
It will only focus on the audio of the selected software and ignore the noise elsewhere, producing a pure track free of other noises. TunesKit Audio Capture, on the other hand, highlights the precision of capturing audio.
As a result, the user will get a chaotic track filled with multiple audio tracks playing at the same time. Once start recording, Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder will capture all the sound from every single software on the computer. However, to record with TunesKit Audio Capture takes more efforts - you have to choose the software in which you record the audio, not to mention sometimes the software needs to be added manually when it is not on the default list.īut the trouble you take recording actually worth it, while the simplicity of Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder can cause inconvenience at last. To start recording in Apowersoff Streaming Audio Recorder is easy - all you need to do is to press the red recording button and the recording will begin. By comparison, Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder only enables users to choose the quality preset of recordings from 3 options, which are high, standard and low.Ĭonclusion: As a whole, here goes another 1 point for TunesKit Audio Capture. In addition, there are way more adjustable options in TunesKit Audio Capture, including codec, bit depth, channel and preset which enable users who are not familiar with the audiophile statistics to simply choose from High-quality recordings and Small-size recordings. It is certainly not likely to finish most books in one time, and with M4B bookmark, you will be able to resume at whichever part of the track. M4B is a format usually used to store audio books in that it allows the user to add bookmarks to the book. On the other hand, TunesKit Audio Capture provides 6 formats, including MP3, M4A, AAC, FLAC, WAC and M4B.Įxcept for the obvious larger selection of formats, TunesKit has another edge that may be easily omitted - its M4B format. There are 6 formats available in Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder, including MP3, AAC, OGG, FLAC, WMA, WAV. If the users want to play the recorded tracks in different software, the streaming audio recorder should be able to save the tracks in as many formats as possible. It means that TunesKit Audio Capture can record nearly lossless tracks of 6 different formats, saving your money from subscribing a Spotify or Deezer premium but still get the same quality music.Ĭonclusion: TunesKit Audio Capture wins this round and earns 1 point. However, TunesKit Audio Capture can provide not only MP3 tracks with bit rate of up to 320kpbs, but also 5 other formats of top-quality tracks. For Apowersoft Streaming Audio Recorder, it produces MP3 and OGG tracks with bit rate of up to 320kpbs.
Luckily, the recording quality of both software is very high. Since most of the recorded tracks will be formed into users' daily playlist, no one would want a collection of songs with terrible quality. The most critical element of a streaming recorder is the sound quality of its recorded tracks. Surpassing the competitor for one round will gain one point, and we will see which one is the winner in the end according to the scores of each side. To make the comparison more objective, several essential factors will be tested in the review: sound quality, sound format, operation process, recording technology, interface, extra functions, and price.
0 kommentar(er)
